{"id":1025,"date":"2011-02-15T08:55:43","date_gmt":"2011-02-15T16:55:43","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/experimentalmath.info\/blog\/?p=1025"},"modified":"2011-02-15T09:00:11","modified_gmt":"2011-02-15T17:00:11","slug":"after-first-day-on-jeopardy-watson-is-tied-for-lead","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/experimentalmath.info\/blog\/2011\/02\/after-first-day-on-jeopardy-watson-is-tied-for-lead\/","title":{"rendered":"After first day on Jeopardy!, Watson is tied for lead"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>Last night (in North America), the long-awaited match between IBM&#8217;s &#8220;Watson&#8221; question-answering computer system and legendary Jeopardy! champs Ken Jennings and Brad Rutter began.  A good part of this first program was devoted to an overview of the Watson system and its development, so only a few minutes were devoted to actual competition.<\/p>\n<p>However, even in this brief introduction, Watson performed very impressively.  In fact, in the first few minutes of the match, Watson performed so well that it looked like it would be a runaway victory, with the machine making shambles of its human competitors.  Even in arenas such as song lyrics, it performed very well.  For example, in response to the clue  &#8220;Bang, bang, his silver hammer came down upon her head,&#8221; Watson correctly responded &#8220;Maxwell&#8217;s Silver Hammer.&#8221;<\/p>\n<p>But then, after a commercial break, Watson showed its &#8220;human&#8221; side and made several gaffes.  For instance, Watson responded &#8220;What is Harry Potter?&#8221; instead of &#8220;What is Valdemort?&#8221; in response to a clue about a Harry Potter episode.   In another memorable blunder, Watson incorrectly responded &#8220;What is finis?&#8221; to the clue &#8220;From the Latin for end, this is where trains can also originate&#8221; rather than &#8220;What is a terminus?,&#8221; the correct answer.<\/p>\n<p>Perhaps the most telling example of Watson&#8217;s limitations was in a question on 20th century history, where Ken Jennings first rang in with the incorrect response &#8220;What is the 1920s?&#8221;.  Then Watson repeated this same wrong answer, a mistake that a human contestant who can hear would never make.  During some practice rounds, Watson was fed the results of other contestants&#8217; responses, but this was not allowed in the official televised match. <\/p>\n<p>One very interesting aspect of the match is that Watson&#8217;s running &#8220;scorecard&#8221; is displayed on the screen for television viewers.  Changing in real time as Watson &#8220;thinks,&#8221; the display shows the level of confidence Watson has in each of the top three answers.  Watson only &#8220;rings in&#8221; when it has a high confidence level (at least 70%) in its response.<\/p>\n<p>Monday&#8217;s partial match ended inconclusively with Watson tied with Brad Rutter for first place at $5000, and Ken Jennings second at $2000.  To be continued!<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Last night (in North America), the long-awaited match between IBM&#8217;s &#8220;Watson&#8221; question-answering computer system and legendary Jeopardy! champs Ken Jennings and Brad Rutter began. A good part of this first program was devoted to an overview of the Watson system and its development, so only a few minutes were devoted to actual competition.<\/p>\n<p>However, even in this brief introduction, Watson performed very impressively. In fact, in the first few minutes of the match, Watson performed so well that it looked like it would be a runaway victory, with the machine making shambles of its human competitors. Even in arenas such <\/p>\n<p>Continue reading <a href=\"https:\/\/experimentalmath.info\/blog\/2011\/02\/after-first-day-on-jeopardy-watson-is-tied-for-lead\/\">After first day on Jeopardy!, Watson is tied for lead<\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[10],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-1025","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-news","odd"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/experimentalmath.info\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1025","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/experimentalmath.info\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/experimentalmath.info\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/experimentalmath.info\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/experimentalmath.info\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=1025"}],"version-history":[{"count":13,"href":"https:\/\/experimentalmath.info\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1025\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":1038,"href":"https:\/\/experimentalmath.info\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1025\/revisions\/1038"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/experimentalmath.info\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=1025"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/experimentalmath.info\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=1025"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/experimentalmath.info\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=1025"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}